June 15 - Crushing the Janissaries: A Sultan’s Bold Strike for Ottoman Survival
The Cost of Spiritual Reformation
This is the day Ottoman Sultan Mahmud II abolished the elite Janissary corps in a violent confrontation that left thousands dead, clearing the path for military modernization in 1826.
In today's lesson, we will explore how institutions created for good can become obstacles to God's purposes when tradition takes precedence over truth. Like the Ottoman Janissaries who transformed from elite defenders into corrupt barriers to progress, our spiritual practices and church traditions can sometimes hinder rather than help our growth in Christ. How do we distinguish between what must be preserved and what must be reformed? What happens when our resistance to change becomes resistance to God Himself?

"You nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition." - Matthew 15:6 (NIV)
This Date in History
The tension in Constantinople had been building for months. Sultan Mahmud II stood at his palace window on the morning of June 15, 1826, watching smoke rise from the direction of the Janissary barracks. His gamble was about to be tested by fire and steel.
For over five centuries, the Janissary corps (yeni çeri, meaning “new army”) had been the backbone of Ottoman military might. Originally recruited through the devshirme system—a practice where young Christian boys were taken from their families in the Balkans, converted to Islam, and trained as elite soldiers loyal only to the sultan—they had helped build one of history's greatest empires.
But by 1826, the 135,000-strong force had become something entirely different. They were no longer the disciplined elite soldiers of old, but a hereditary privileged class that collected military pay while operating as craftsmen, shopkeepers, and political kingmakers. Their tax-exempt status and effective veto power over imperial policy had made them increasingly corrupt and resistant to any reform that threatened their position.
Mahmud II understood what previous sultans had learned too late. In 1807, the Janissaries had overthrown and killed Sultan Selim III after he attempted military reforms. Any ruler who dared challenge their authority faced the same fate. But the empire was crumbling around them. Military defeats against European powers, separatist movements in the Balkans, and administrative chaos demanded urgent modernization. The choice was stark: destroy the Janissaries or watch the empire collapse.
The sultan had spent years preparing for this moment. He quietly built alliances with religious leaders, gaining crucial support from the grand mufti. He strengthened his artillery corps to 12,000 men and secured the loyalty of other military units. Most importantly, he had studied the failures of his predecessors and planned every detail of what he knew would be a life-or-death confrontation.
On June 14, the Janissaries assembled in the Hippodrome, demanding an audience with the sultan to voice their grievances about new military regulations. They overturned their soup kettles in the traditional gesture of rebellion, expecting Mahmud to capitulate as previous rulers had done. Instead, the sultan declared them traitors and ordered his artillery to open fire.
The battle raged through the streets of Constantinople. Artillery shells set the Janissary barracks ablaze, trapping thousands inside. Those who escaped faced angry crowds of civilians who had long resented the Janissaries' abuses and privileges. When Mahmud unfurled the Holy Banner of Prophet Muhammad, calling all true believers to rally against the rebels, the tide turned decisively. By evening, an estimated 4,000 to 6,000 Janissaries lay dead in the capital alone.
The survivors faced a grim fate. Those captured were either executed, exiled, or imprisoned. Their properties were confiscated by the state. In Thessaloniki, the remaining Janissaries were beheaded in what became known as the "Blood Tower." The Bektashi Sufi order, closely associated with the Janissaries, was outlawed and its followers executed or banished.
Within days, Mahmud established the "Asakir-i Mansure-i Muhammediye" (The Victorious Soldiers of Muhammad), a modern army trained by European instructors. The old military fiefs were abolished, and a new system of centralized command took shape. The sultan had accomplished what seemed impossible: he had broken the power of the Janissaries and lived to tell about it.

Historical Context
The Ottoman Empire of 1826 was an empire in crisis, struggling to maintain its position as European powers advanced rapidly in military technology and administrative efficiency. Following a series of devastating defeats, including the loss of territories in the Balkans and the humiliating Treaty of Bucharest in 1812 which ceded Bessarabia to Russia, it became clear that the empire's traditional military structure was no longer adequate for modern warfare. The Greek War of Independence, which began in 1821, had further exposed Ottoman military weaknesses when European-trained Greek forces consistently outmaneuvered traditional Ottoman troops.
The Janissary problem had been festering for decades. What began in the 14th century as an elite slave-soldier system had devolved into a hereditary caste that numbered 135,000 by 1826, with most members never actually serving in combat. They had become the empire's kingmakers, deposing any sultan who threatened their privileges, while their tax exemptions and guaranteed salaries drained the imperial treasury. Previous reform attempts, particularly Sultan Selim III's "Nizam-i Cedid" (New Order) military reforms, had been crushed by Janissary revolts, demonstrating that meaningful modernization was impossible as long as this entrenched military aristocracy retained power. Mahmud II's decisive action represented not just military reform, but a fundamental restructuring of Ottoman political authority.

Did You Know?
The soup kettles (kazan) that the Janissaries overturned as a symbol of rebellion were sacred to them, representing their brotherhood and shared meals. Overturning these kettles was their traditional way of declaring mutiny, and the act was considered so serious that it automatically meant a fight to the death.
Sultan Mahmud II wore European-style clothing during the confrontation, symbolically rejecting Ottoman tradition even in his dress. After the Janissaries' destruction, he mandated that all government officials adopt the fez and European-style uniforms, marking a dramatic break from centuries of Ottoman court dress.
The Holy Banner of Prophet Muhammad that Mahmud unfurled during the battle was one of the most sacred relics in the Ottoman Empire, traditionally only displayed during major religious ceremonies or extreme emergencies. By using this banner against the Janissaries, the sultan framed the conflict as a holy war between true believers and rebels.
The new army created to replace the Janissaries initially struggled with recruitment because many Muslims viewed military service as beneath their dignity, having associated it with the slave-soldier tradition. The Ottomans had to implement conscription and offer significant incentives to build their modern military force.
Today’s Reflection
The smoke cleared over Constantinople on June 15, 1826, revealing not only charred barracks but a turning point in Ottoman history. Sultan Mahmud II had done the unthinkable. He had crushed the Janissaries, an elite force that had once symbolized strength and loyalty but had grown into a corrupt barrier to reform.
What had begun as a brotherhood devoted to the empire's defense had become its greatest threat. To move forward, Mahmud dismantled the very institution that had once defined Ottoman power.
In the life of faith, we sometimes face a similar, though less dramatic, reckoning. Structures built for good, even those that once nurtured truth, can harden into barriers that obscure God's work.
Jesus saw this clearly when He rebuked the Pharisees: "You nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition" (Matthew 15:6 (NIV)).
What began as zeal for holiness had become a rigid defense of human rules, shielding hearts from genuine encounter with God.
The Janissaries once defended the Ottoman Empire with courage and skill. But over time, their power bred pride, their privileges fostered greed, and their influence created stagnation. They became so invested in preserving their status that they lost sight of their original purpose.
When the empire desperately needed modernization to survive, they chose self-preservation over service. Their loyalty to past victories blinded them to present needs. A warning not just for institutions, but for every heart slow to change.
As believers, we can easily fall into similar patterns. A church may cling to traditions that once bore fruit but now hinder growth. Personal spiritual practices, once full of meaning, can drift into lifeless ritual.
Even deep biblical knowledge can become a source of pride instead of humble service. When we resist God's ongoing work in our lives, we risk becoming like the Janissaries. Defenders of fading forms rather than followers of the living Christ.
Paul understood this tension between the old and the new. He urged believers to: "Not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind" (Romans 12:2 (NIV)).
Transformation demands more than minor tweaks. It requires surrender. It often calls us to let go of what we've always done to embrace what God is doing now.
Not every tradition needs to die, but every tradition must kneel before Christ.
If it cannot serve His purposes, it cannot stay.
The destruction of the Janissaries was undeniably violent. Mahmud's purge is no model of righteousness, but it highlights a hard truth: some systems resist change so fiercely they must be dismantled before renewal can begin.
In our spiritual lives, repentance sometimes demands radical honesty and decisive steps. Not to harm, but to heal.
"If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away" (Matthew 5:29 (NIV)).
Jesus wasn't endorsing self-harm. He was revealing the seriousness of sin and the cost of real change.
Spiritual growth often requires cutting away what once seemed essential.
Yet this call to reform is not a call to despair. The same Jesus who asks us to cast off sin also invites us to come to Him weary and burdened, promising rest for our souls.
His grace is not only the reason we repent. It is the power that makes repentance possible.
The question becomes personal: Are there areas in our lives where we've resisted necessary reformation out of fear or nostalgia? Have we grown so comfortable with familiar spiritual routines that we've stopped growing?
Are we defending traditions that no longer serve God's purposes?
True spiritual maturity embraces both conviction and grace. It means allowing God to reshape us, not out of guilt, but out of love. It means choosing His purposes over our preferences, and His truth over our traditions.
The Janissaries chose self-preservation and lost everything. But we are invited to choose transformation, and in doing so, to walk more deeply into the eternal life Christ offers.
Practical Application
Conduct a spiritual inventory of your current practices and commitments, asking God to reveal areas where tradition has replaced transformation. Choose one specific area where you sense resistance to God's ongoing work in your life and take a concrete step toward change this week, whether that means adjusting a spiritual discipline that has become routine, addressing a relationship pattern that no longer serves love, or releasing a ministry role that has become more about status than service. Remember that reformation is not about perfection but about renewed alignment with Christ's purposes for your life.
Closing Prayer
Heavenly Father, we thank You for Your patience with our resistance to change and growth. We acknowledge that You are always working to transform us into the image of Your Son, even when we cling to familiar patterns that no longer serve Your purposes. Lord, give us the courage to examine our hearts honestly, to identify where tradition has overshadowed truth, and where comfort has replaced conviction. Help us to surrender the practices, attitudes, and structures in our lives that hinder rather than help our spiritual growth. Grant us wisdom to discern between what must be preserved and what must be reformed, and give us the strength to choose transformation over self-preservation. We trust in Your grace as both the motivation and the power for change, knowing that You who began a good work in us will carry it on to completion. In Jesus' name, Amen.
Final Thoughts
God's call to spiritual transformation is not an invitation to perpetual self-criticism but to deeper freedom in Christ. When we allow Him to reform the structures and patterns of our faith lives, we discover that what seemed like loss was actually liberation. The courage to let go of what no longer serves His purposes opens our hands to receive what He has prepared for us. True spiritual maturity recognizes that reformation is not about destroying our past but about allowing God to reshape our future.
Also On This Date In History
June 15 - Vintage TV Magic: Remembering "Hee Haw's" First Smash Episode
This is the day the television variety show "Hee Haw" with Roy Clark & Buck Owens premiered on CBS TV in 1969.
Author’s Notes
I rarely venture into overtly political territory here on THIS IS THE DAY, out of respect for readers who share my passion for history and faith but may hold different political perspectives. Yet sometimes history speaks so directly to our present moment that the parallel becomes impossible to ignore, and the spiritual lessons we've drawn demand contemporary application.
The scenes unfolding in Los Angeles over the past week mirror Sultan Mahmud II's dilemma in a striking way. What began as an immigration system designed to serve America's needs has, over decades, evolved into something that now challenges the very authority it was meant to respect. When protesters display foreign flags while violently resisting federal law enforcement and declaring their "right" to remain illegally, we witness the same dynamic the Janissaries exhibited—a system meant to serve the nation being turned against it by those who benefited from its tolerance.
Like the corrupt Janissaries who had forgotten their original purpose of defending the empire, some who entered through a broken immigration system now resist the very laws that define national sovereignty. The violent opposition to immigration enforcement, complete with attacks on federal agents, burning of vehicles, and destruction of property reveals how tolerance of institutional breakdown eventually requires decisive action to restore order.
Mahmud II faced the same choice America faces today: preserve a dysfunctional system to avoid conflict, or make the difficult decision to restore the rule of law. In both cases, reformation requires confronting those who have grown comfortable exploiting institutional weakness, even when they claim moral authority for their resistance.
The spiritual lesson remains the same—sometimes what we've allowed to persist in the name of compassion becomes the very thing that destroys what we sought to protect.
If you’ve made it this far down the page can you do me a favor? Let me know what you thought about today’s newsletter. Leave a comment or like (❤️) this post. I would really appreciate it.
Thank you for coralation from history. Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. It is very present with what is going on in LA. We need our eyes opened to see. To many bury thier head in the swamp. Thanks for helping us to keep looking at Jesus as King.
Do not forget that foreign enemies wants you people to be divided over this. And yes this includes russia.