August 6 - Electrifying Justice: The Heart-Stopping First Use of the Electric Chair
Ethical Stewardship in the Age of Innovation
This is the day William Kemmler became the first person to be executed by electric chair in 1890 at Auburn Prison in New York.
In today's lesson, we will explore the shocking debut of the electric chair and its implications for ethical technological progress. How do we balance innovation with moral responsibility in our rapidly advancing world?
"There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death." - Proverbs 14:12 (NIV)
This Date in History
On the morning of August 6, 1890, a hush fell over Auburn Prison in New York as William Kemmler was led to a wooden chair unlike any seen before. The air crackled with tension and morbid curiosity as witnesses gathered to observe a grim milestone in the annals of criminal justice: the world's first execution by electric chair.
Kemmler's path to this fateful moment began on March 29, 1889, when he brutally murdered his common-law wife, Matilda "Tillie" Ziegler. In a drunken rage, Kemmler pursued Tillie into a barn and hacked her to death with a hatchet. The gruesome nature of the crime shocked the community of Buffalo, New York, and Kemmler was swiftly arrested, tried, and sentenced to death.
As Kemmler awaited his fate, a heated debate raged over execution methods in America. Hanging, the traditional form of capital punishment, had fallen out of favor due to its inconsistent results. Sometimes, the drop was too short, resulting in a slow, agonizing strangulation. Other times, it was too long, gruesomely decapitating the condemned. The search for a more "humane" method of execution coincided with the rapid advancement of electricity in American society.
Enter Alfred P. Southwick, a dentist and former steamboat engineer, who proposed using electricity for executions after witnessing an intoxicated man die instantly upon touching a generator terminal. Southwick's idea found a powerful ally in Thomas Edison, who saw an opportunity to discredit his rival George Westinghouse's alternating current (AC) system by promoting it for use in executions.
New York State, eager to position itself at the forefront of progress, embraced the concept. In 1888, the state legislature passed a law mandating electrocution for capital cases. However, the path to implementation was far from smooth. Westinghouse refused to sell generators for execution purposes, forcing the state to acquire used Westinghouse equipment through intermediaries.
As Kemmler's execution date approached, last-minute legal challenges flew. His lawyers argued that electrocution constituted "cruel and unusual punishment," but the courts ultimately upheld the sentence. On that fateful August morning, Kemmler was strapped into the chair, electrodes attached to his head and back.
At 6:43 a.m., the switch was thrown. Kemmler's body stiffened, and after 17 seconds, the current was turned off. Shockingly, witnesses soon realized Kemmler was still breathing. In a panicked scramble, officials reapplied the current for over a minute, causing Kemmler's blood vessels to rupture and his skin to burn.
The botched execution horrified onlookers. George Westinghouse later remarked, "They would have done better using an axe." Despite this gruesome debut, the electric chair gained traction. Other states adopted the method, and it remained a primary form of execution in the United States for decades.
The first use of the electric chair not only changed the landscape of capital punishment but also intensified debates over its ethics and effectiveness. It highlighted the complex interplay between justice, technology, and humanity's search for "civilized" ways to carry out the ultimate punishment – a debate that continues to resonate in modern discussions of criminal justice and the death penalty.
Historical Context
The late 19th century in America was an era of rapid technological advancement and fierce industrial competition. At the heart of this period was the "War of Currents," a battle that would shape the future of electricity and, unexpectedly, capital punishment.
Thomas Edison, already famous for his invention of the light bulb, championed direct current (DC) electricity. DC was safe but limited in its ability to transmit power over long distances. Enter George Westinghouse, who saw the potential in Nikola Tesla's alternating current (AC) system. AC could be transmitted over vast distances more efficiently, making it more practical for widespread adoption.
Edison, fearing the loss of his DC empire, embarked on a ruthless campaign to discredit AC. He spread misinformation about its dangers and even publicly electrocuted animals using AC to demonstrate its lethal potential. This macabre spectacle caught the attention of those seeking a more "humane" method of execution.
Alfred P. Southwick, who had witnessed an accidental death from electrocution, believed it could provide a quick, painless alternative to hanging. He approached Edison with the concept, hoping to gain the inventor's support. Edison was initially reluctant to associate his inventions with death but ultimately saw an opportunity to further his campaign against AC. He recommended using Westinghouse's AC generators for the electric chair, hoping to taint AC's public image. Westinghouse, realizing the potential damage to his business, refused to sell his generators for this purpose and even funded Kemmler's legal appeals.
Meanwhile, the public's attitude toward capital punishment was evolving. Hangings, once public spectacles, had been moved behind prison walls due to concerns about their brutalizing effect on society. However, botched hangings still occurred, leading to calls for a more reliable method.
New York State, eager to establish itself as progressive, became the first to adopt electrocution as its official method of execution in 1888. The state commissioned Harold Brown, an Edison associate, to design the electric chair. Brown, with Edison's clandestine support, insisted on using AC for the chair.
This period also saw significant social reforms. The temperance movement was gaining momentum, reflecting growing concerns about alcohol's societal impact – a factor in Kemmler's crime. Women's suffrage was becoming an increasingly prominent issue, highlighting changing attitudes toward equality and justice.
In the realm of criminal justice, the concept of rehabilitation was beginning to emerge alongside traditional notions of punishment and deterrence. However, for the most serious crimes, the death penalty remained widely accepted. The introduction of the electric chair was seen by many as a step forward in making executions more clinical and less barbaric.
The battle between Edison and Westinghouse over electrical standards would continue long after Kemmler's execution, ultimately shaping the electrical infrastructure we rely on today. However, their rivalry's unexpected foray into capital punishment left an indelible mark on the American justice system, intertwining technological progress with ongoing debates about the ethics and methods of execution.
Did You Know?
The electric chair was nicknamed "Old Sparky" by prison guards and inmates, a moniker that would stick for decades across various prisons.
Learn More
Executioner's Current: Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse, and the Invention of the Electric Chair - Richard Moran
The Death of Innocents: An Eyewitness Account of Wrongful Executions - Sister Helen Prejean
Ethics in the Age of Technology - George D. Catalano
The Technological Society - Jacques Ellul
Today’s Reflection
The advent of the electric chair in 1890 serves as a powerful metaphor for our current technological crossroads. As we stand on the brink of Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution, genetic engineering breakthroughs, and unprecedented digital integration, the lessons from this historical event resonate with renewed urgency. "There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death." Proverbs 14:12 (NIV) This proverb challenges us to look beyond surface-level progress and consider the deeper implications of our innovations.
The electric chair's creation stemmed from a genuine desire for a more humane method of execution. This intention, though perhaps misguided in this situation, reminds us that technological progress often begins with noble aspirations. Similarly, AI promises to solve complex problems, genetic engineering offers hope for eradicating diseases, and social media aims to connect humanity like never before. As Christians, we're called not to fear these advancements, but to engage with them thoughtfully and ethically.
However, the story of William Kemmler's execution also reveals a darker side of progress. Thomas Edison's promotion of the electric chair wasn't driven by compassion, but by a desire to discredit his rival's alternating current. His actions remind us of the apostle Paul's warning: "For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil. Some people, eager for money, have wandered from the faith and pierced themselves with many griefs." 1 Timothy 6:10 (NIV) In our modern context, we must be vigilant against those who would exploit technological advancements for personal gain at the expense of ethical considerations.
Consider the potential of AI to make critical decisions in healthcare, criminal justice, or warfare. While it may promise efficiency and objectivity, we must ask: Can an algorithm truly capture the nuances of human dignity and the sanctity of life? In genetic engineering, we face the prospect of "designer babies" and human enhancement. These technologies could alleviate suffering, but they also risk commodifying human life and exacerbating societal inequalities.
As followers of Christ, we're called to be "in the world but not of the world" John 17:14-15 (NIV). This means engaging with technological progress while maintaining our moral compass. We must ask difficult questions: Does this technology honor the image of God in every person? Does it promote justice and compassion? Does it respect the boundaries of creation that God has established?
The electric chair, despite its flawed debut, did eventually lead to more reliable methods of execution. This reminds us that initial failures in technology don't negate the potential for positive outcomes. However, it also underscores the need for constant ethical evaluation and refinement of our innovations.
In navigating these complex issues, we can draw wisdom from Scripture. Solomon teaches us to "Get wisdom, get understanding; do not forget my words or turn away from them." Proverbs 4:5 (NIV) This calls us to educate ourselves about emerging technologies, to understand their potential benefits and risks, and to actively participate in shaping their development and application.
Moreover, we must cultivate discernment. Paul exhorts us to "test everything; hold fast what is good." 1 Thessalonians 5:21 (ESV) This involves critically examining new technologies, not with fear or blind acceptance, but with a balanced perspective rooted in our faith.
As we forge ahead in this age of rapid technological advancement, let us strive to be like Daniel, who served with integrity in a foreign culture without compromising his faith. We are called to be salt and light in the world of technology, advocating for innovations that uplift humanity, protect the vulnerable, and honor God's creation.
The story of the electric chair serves as both a cautionary tale and a call to action. It challenges us to pursue progress that aligns with God's values, to be ethical stewards of technology, and to ensure that in our quest for advancement, we do not lose sight of the eternal truths that define our humanity and our relationship with our Creator.
Practical Application
Engage in a "tech ethics" assessment of your daily life. Choose one piece of technology you use regularly and examine its impact on your spiritual and moral well-being. Consider questions like: How does this technology affect my relationships? Does it promote or hinder my ability to show love and compassion? Does it respect the dignity of others? Then, create a personal usage policy that aligns this technology with your Christian values. This might involve setting boundaries, being more intentional in its use, or finding ways to leverage it for positive spiritual growth and community building.
Closing Prayer
Heavenly Father, in this age of rapid technological change, grant us wisdom to discern Your will. Help us to embrace progress that honors Your creation and rejects that which diminishes human dignity. Guide us to be ethical stewards of innovation, always seeking to align our advancements with Your eternal truths. May we be salt and light in the digital age, using our God-given creativity to glorify You and serve others. In Jesus' name, Amen.
Supplementary Study
"Let the wise listen and add to their learning, and let the discerning get guidance"
This verse encourages us to continually seek wisdom and guidance, which is crucial when navigating the ethical challenges presented by new technologies.
"Be very careful, then, how you live—not as unwise but as wise, making the most of every opportunity, because the days are evil."
This passage reminds us to be intentional and wise in how we live, which includes how we interact with and use technology in our daily lives.
"Whatever you do, work at it with all your heart, as working for the Lord, not for human masters, since you know that you will receive an inheritance from the Lord as a reward. It is the Lord Christ you are serving."
This verse encourages us to approach all our work, including technological innovation, as service to God, maintaining ethical integrity in all we do.
Final Thoughts
The story of the electric chair's debut serves as a powerful reminder that technological progress, while often driven by good intentions, can lead to unexpected ethical dilemmas. As Christians in the digital age, we are called to be discerning stewards of innovation, carefully considering the moral implications of new technologies. By grounding our approach to progress in biblical wisdom and maintaining a focus on honoring God and serving others, we can help shape a future where technological advancement aligns with our highest values and contributes to the flourishing of all humanity.
Community Engagement
Share your thoughts or use these questions to get the conversation started.
What technological advancement in recent years has made you pause to consider its ethical implications?
How can we, as Christians, actively participate in shaping the ethical development and use of new technologies?
In what ways might our church community leverage technology to better serve God and others while maintaining our spiritual integrity?
Reflecting on the story of the electric chair, how can we balance the pursuit of progress with the preservation of our moral values in today's rapidly advancing world?
This devotional is free to read. You can support this publication by becoming a subscriber, liking this post, commenting, and/or sharing this post with anyone who might enjoy it.
In tomorrow's lesson, we'll explore how a simple dispute can spiral into a decades-long conflict, tearing families and communities apart. Join us as we uncover the spiritual dangers of harboring resentment and the transformative power of forgiveness in even the most bitter of feuds.
It seems like execution is no longer a deterrent to murder these days...
I'm not a fan of AI and I believe these cell phones are too much. Idk what the answer is but I'm more productive and happy when I limit my time on technology.