July 8 - Unyielding Faith: First Crusade’s Starving Army and the Jerusalem Miracle
The Peril of Cherry-Picking Scripture and Selective Obedience
This is the day in 1099 AD when 15,000 starving Christian soldiers of the First Crusade marched in a religious procession around Jerusalem while its Muslim defenders looked on.
In today's lesson, we will explore the dangers of selective obedience in our faith journey. How can the story of the Crusaders' march around Jerusalem challenge us to examine our own approach to following God's Word? What might we learn about the importance of embracing the whole counsel of Scripture, even when it's uncomfortable or challenging?
"For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it." - James 2:10 (NIV)
This Date in History
Imagine a scorching July day in 1099, the air thick with tension and the scent of impending battle. Outside the towering walls of Jerusalem, an extraordinary scene unfolds: 15,000 Christian soldiers, their bodies gaunt from starvation, their spirits tested by years of grueling campaign, begin a solemn march around the Holy City. This wasn't a military maneuver but an act of desperate faith - a moment that would mark a turning point in one of history's most consequential religious conflicts: the First Crusade.
To understand the gravity of this moment, we must step back to 1095. Europe was a continent in turmoil, grappling with overpopulation, famine, and social unrest. In this climate, Pope Urban II made a thunderous call to arms at the Council of Clermont. His message was clear: Christian pilgrims were being persecuted in the Holy Land, and it was the duty of all Christians to liberate Jerusalem from Muslim rule. The Pope's words ignited a fire across Europe, promising salvation and glory to those who would take up the cross.
What followed was an unprecedented mobilization. Nobles and peasants alike sold their possessions and left their homes, driven by a potent mixture of religious fervor, a desire for adventure, and the promise of wealth and land in the East. The journey was perilous - thousands died from hunger, disease, and battle long before reaching their destination.
By the time the Crusaders reached Jerusalem in June 1099, their experiences had transformed them. They had witnessed Constantinople's opulence, endured Anatolia's scorching heat, and tasted victory at Antioch. But nothing had prepared them for the challenge that Jerusalem presented. Under Fatimid control, the city was well-fortified and prepared for a long siege.
As weeks passed, the Crusaders' situation grew desperate. Their supplies were dwindling, water was scarce, and disease was rampant in their camps. In this moment of crisis, the leaders of the Crusade—men like Godfrey of Bouillon, Raymond of Toulouse, and Robert of Normandy—turned to an act of profound symbolism.
Inspired by the biblical story of Joshua at Jericho, they organized a religious procession around the walls of Jerusalem. On July 8, 15,000 starving soldiers, many barefoot and carrying relics, began their march. They chanted prayers and hymns, their voices rising in a cacophony of languages - French, German, Italian - united in their fervent belief that God would deliver the city into their hands.
From atop the walls, the Muslim defenders watched in a mixture of bewilderment and trepidation. The sight of these haggard yet determined warriors circling the city in an act of faith must have been both bizarre and unnerving.
This procession was more than a military tactic; it was a powerful demonstration of the Crusaders’ unwavering conviction. It reinvigorated their spirits and steeled their resolve for the final assault. Within days, on July 15, the Crusaders would breach the walls of Jerusalem, unleashing a wave of violence that would shock even their contemporaries.
The events of July 8, 1099, encapsulate the essence of the First Crusade—a volatile mixture of faith, desperation, and unyielding determination. They stand as a testament to the power of belief in shaping human actions and the course of history. The capture of Jerusalem that followed would redraw the map of the Middle East, establish the Crusader states, and set the stage for centuries of conflict and cultural exchange between East and West.
This moment, when 15,000 starving soldiers marched around Jerusalem, wasn't just a footnote in history - it was the culmination of a journey that had transformed both the individuals involved and the medieval world at large. It serves as a stark reminder of the complex interplay between faith, warfare, and cultural clash that defined the Crusades and continues to echo throughout history.
Historical Context
The First Crusade unfolded against significant religious and political upheaval in Europe and the Middle East. In the 11th century, the Christian world was deeply divided between the Roman Catholic Church in the West and the Eastern Orthodox Church, with the Great Schism of 1054 exacerbating tensions. Meanwhile, the Islamic world was experiencing its own internal conflicts, with the Sunni Seljuk Turks challenging the power of the Shia Fatimid Caliphate.
Once a formidable power, the Byzantine Empire was under increasing pressure from Seljuk expansion. In 1071, the Seljuks dealt a crushing blow to the Byzantines at the Battle of Manzikert, leading to the loss of much of Anatolia. This military defeat and the Seljuk disruption of Christian pilgrimages to Jerusalem set the stage for Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos to appeal to the West for military assistance.
In Europe, the 11th century saw the emergence of a more assertive papacy, exemplified by the Gregorian Reforms. These reforms aimed to purify the Church and assert papal authority over secular rulers. This period also witnessed the rise of the Peace and Truce of God movements, attempts by the Church to limit violence among Christians and redirect it towards external threats.
Socioeconomic factors in Europe played a crucial role in the Crusade's popularity. Overpopulation, combined with the practice of primogeniture (inheritance by the firstborn son), left many noblemen landless and eager for new territories. For the peasantry, the promise of freedom from serfdom and the remission of sins offered powerful incentives to join the Crusade.
The Islamic world at this time was far from monolithic. The Abbasid Caliphate, once the center of a vast empire, had been reduced to a figurehead role. Real power was divided among various sultanates and emirates. The Fatimid Caliphate, based in Egypt, controlled Jerusalem but was in conflict with the Seljuk Turks, who had taken control of much of the Middle East and Anatolia.
This fragmentation of the Islamic world initially worked to the Crusaders' advantage, as Muslim rulers often failed to present a united front against the invaders. However, it also meant that the region’s political landscape was complex and constantly shifting, making it difficult for the Crusaders to establish lasting alliances or stable territories.
The concept of holy war was not new to either Christians or Muslims. Islamic tradition had long included the idea of jihad, which could be interpreted as both an internal spiritual struggle and an external military conflict. In Christianity, the idea of a "just war" had been developed by theologians like Augustine, but the concept of war as a means of penance was a novel development of the Crusade era.
Culturally, the Crusade represented a clash between two worlds that remained largely mysterious to each other despite centuries of interaction through trade and conflict. The Crusaders encountered societies that were, in many ways, more advanced than their own, particularly in areas of science, medicine, and philosophy. This encounter would have profound long-term effects on European culture and intellectual life.
The First Crusade, therefore, was not merely a military expedition but a complex phenomenon shaped by religious fervor, political ambition, economic pressures, and cultural misunderstanding. The procession around Jerusalem on July 8, 1099, was a moment where all these factors converged, setting the stage for centuries of conflict and cultural exchange that would reshape both the Middle East and Europe.
Did You Know?
The First Crusade was actually preceded by the less organized and ill-fated People's Crusade, led by Peter the Hermit. This earlier expedition, comprised mostly of peasants and low-ranking knights, was almost entirely destroyed by the Seljuk Turks before reaching the Holy Land.
Learn More
The First Crusade: A New History - Thomas Asbridge
God's War: A New History of the Crusades - Christopher Tyerman
The Crusades: The Authoritative History of the War for the Holy Land - Thomas Asbridge
Chronicles of the First Crusade - Christopher Tyerman (Editor)
Today’s Reflection
The image of 15,000 starving Christian soldiers marching around Jerusalem in 1099 AD presents a striking paradox. These Crusaders, driven by religious zeal, sought to claim the holy city through an act reminiscent of Joshua's conquest of Jericho. Yet, in their singular focus on this Old Testament narrative, they seemed to overlook the teachings of Christ that form the cornerstone of their faith.
This historical moment powerfully illustrates selective obedience, a pitfall that continues to challenge believers today. The Crusaders' actions reflected a cherry-picking of Scripture, embracing the parts that aligned with their military objectives while disregarding Jesus' radical calls for love, even towards enemies.
James, in his epistle, provides a sobering perspective on this approach to faith. He writes, "For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it" James 2:10. This verse cuts to the heart of selective obedience, reminding us that God's law is not a buffet from which we can select only the parts we find palatable.
Consider the implications of this truth. How often do we, like the Crusaders, focus on certain aspects of our faith while conveniently overlooking others? Perhaps we diligently attend church and engage in Bible study yet struggle to love our difficult neighbor. Or maybe we're quick to judge others' shortcomings while turning a blind eye to our own areas of disobedience.
The danger of selective obedience lies not just in the acts of disobedience themselves but in the distorted view of God and His will that it creates. When we pick and choose which parts of Scripture to follow, we essentially create a god in our own image, one who conveniently agrees with all our preferences and prejudices.
This selective approach can lead to a fragmented faith that lacks integrity and fails to reflect the holistic transformation that Christ calls us to. It's a faith that might look impressive from certain angles, like the Crusaders' dramatic procession but crumbles under closer scrutiny.
However, James' words, while convicting, also point us towards a solution. He underscores the interconnectedness of God's commands by reminding us that stumbling at one point makes us guilty of breaking the whole law. This interconnectedness invites us to approach Scripture holistically, seeking to understand and apply its teachings in their full context.
Embracing this holistic approach requires humility and openness to correction. It demands that we confront the uncomfortable parts of Scripture, the teachings that challenge our preconceptions and call us to change. It asks us to view God's Word not as a tool to justify our actions, but as a mirror that reveals our need for ongoing transformation.
In our modern context, this might mean examining our personal lives for areas where we've become complacent in our faith. For instance, we might be diligent in our church attendance and Bible study, but do we apply the same diligence to controlling our tongue, as James warns about in James 3:9-10? Or perhaps we're strong advocates for traditional family values, but do we show the same commitment to Jesus' teachings on forgiveness and reconciliation in our own relationships?
Consider how easily we might condemn certain sins while being lenient on others. We might rightly stand firm against clear biblical prohibitions, but do we apply the same standard to more socially acceptable sins, like gossip, pride, or materialism? The challenge is to apply God's Word consistently across all areas of our lives, not just the ones that align with our personal or cultural preferences.
Moreover, we might need to examine our motivations in our Christian service. Are we serving out of genuine love for God and others, or are we, like the Pharisees, sometimes more concerned with how our righteousness appears to others? Jesus' words in Matthew 6:1 remind us to check our hearts in this matter.
The Crusaders' march around Jerusalem serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us of the pitfalls of selective obedience. Yet, it also presents an opportunity for self-reflection and growth. As we contemplate their actions - the religious fervor coupled with brutal disregard for Christ's teachings on love and mercy - we're invited to examine our own lives, identifying areas where we might be guilty of similar selectivity in our faith.
Let us strive for a faith that embraces the whole counsel of Scripture, even when it challenges us. May we approach God's Word with humility and openness, allowing it to shape us fully rather than selectively applying it to suit our preferences. In doing so, we move towards a more authentic, integrated faith that truly reflects the gospel's transformative power in every aspect of our lives.
Practical Application
Take time this week to conduct a personal "spiritual audit." Choose one day and carefully observe your thoughts, words, and actions. Note instances where you might be practicing selective obedience – perhaps in how you treat others, manage your resources, or respond to challenges. Reflect on these observations, asking yourself why you might find certain biblical teachings easier to follow than others. Then, choose one area where you've identified selective obedience and commit to aligning it more closely with Scripture. This might involve memorizing relevant Bible verses, setting up accountability with a trusted friend, or creating practical strategies to implement change.
Closing Prayer
Heavenly Father, we come before You humbled by the realization of our tendency towards selective obedience. Forgive us for the times we've chosen to follow only the parts of Your Word that suit us. Grant us the courage to confront the areas in our lives where we fall short and the wisdom to apply Your teachings holistically. May Your Holy Spirit guide us to a more authentic and integrated faith that reflects Your character in every aspect of our lives. In Jesus' name, we pray. Amen.
Supplementary Study
"Do not merely listen to the word, and so deceive yourselves. Do what it says."
This verse reinforces the theme of our lesson by emphasizing the importance of not just knowing Scripture but actively applying it in our lives. It challenges us to move beyond selective obedience to full engagement with God's Word.
"For I have not hesitated to proclaim to you the whole will of God."
Paul's commitment to teaching the whole counsel of God aligns with our lesson's focus on embracing all of Scripture, not just the parts we find comfortable or convenient. It encourages us to seek a comprehensive understanding of God's will.
"If you love me, keep my commands."
Jesus directly links love for Him with obedience to His commands. This verse challenges us to examine whether our selective obedience might indicate areas where our love for Christ is lacking, encouraging a more holistic faith.
Final Thoughts
The story of the Crusaders' procession around Jerusalem serves as a powerful reminder of the dangers of selective obedience. It challenges us to examine our own lives and faith practices, urging us to strive for a more holistic application of God's Word. As we reflect on this historical event and its spiritual implications, may we be inspired to pursue a consistent, integrated faith that reflects Christ's teachings in every aspect of our lives. Let us approach Scripture with humility, ready to be transformed by its full message, rather than selectively applying it to suit our preferences.
Community Engagement
Share your thoughts or use these questions to get the conversation started.
In what ways do you think the Crusaders justified their actions despite their inconsistency with Christ's teachings?
Can you share a time when you realized you were practicing selective obedience in your faith? How did you address it?
How might our church community help each other in identifying and overcoming areas of selective obedience?
In what ways can we ensure we're interpreting and applying Scripture holistically rather than selectively?
This devotional is free to read. You can support this publication by becoming a subscriber, liking this post, commenting, and/or sharing this post with anyone who might enjoy it.
In tomorrow's lesson, we'll explore how a moment of destruction became a catalyst for preservation. Discover how an unexpected disaster led to a reevaluation of what truly matters, both in the world of cinema and in our spiritual lives.
First of all, I am compelled to praise your diligence to study, your analysis of ancient events, your clear writing and, most of all your always-applicable Closing Prayer.
Secondly, despite Christ's message of love and turning the other cheek, was contrary to the dictates of Pope Urban and the Catholic church. I cannot convince myself that the Crusades (while ultimately a failure) were a bad decision. If the EU and the USA had the courage, they would immediately set up and prepare safeguards against the Muslim plan to take over the world. Interestingly, the USA seems poised for war in order to create a one world government - while Russia defends Orthodox Christianity against the aggression of NATO.
Were the Crusaders wrong to circle the city? Possibly, through a show of force, they hoped to avoid an armed conflict. If they were, in fact, attempting to duplicate Joshua's feat, it was a giant leap of faith to assume that YHWH was protecting them. As far as I know, the only group (now destroyed by the Papacy) that believed that a different God was in charge during the Old Testament days and the times of Jesus. were the Cathars.
Interestingly, I have yet to find a church that preaches one word from the OT. In fact, very few preach the words of Jesus as they are too busy arranging and conducting their "Christian rock shows".
Keep up the good work, Jason. I soon will be recommending you and seven other Substack writers as my favorites. Stay tuned.
Jason, you are spot on with... "This historical moment powerfully illustrates selective obedience, a pitfall that continues to challenge believers today. The Crusaders' actions reflected a cherry-picking of Scripture, embracing the parts that aligned with their military objectives while disregarding Jesus' radical calls for love, even towards enemies."
It brought to mind Isaiah 64:4...
For since the beginning of the world
Men have not heard nor perceived by the ear,
Nor has the eye seen any God besides You,
Who acts for the one who waits for Him.